NBMEcalc vs AMBOSS Step 2 CK Predictor
A source-labeled comparison of access, supported inputs, output ranges, and published evidence. Product facts were checked against AMBOSS's public Score Predictor page.
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | NBMEcalc | AMBOSS Predictor |
|---|---|---|
| Use without a paid subscription | ||
| Accepts multiple practice results | ||
| NBME form inputs | ||
| Free 120 input | ||
| UWSA input named on public product page | ||
| CMS subject-score guidance | ||
| Planning range shown | ||
| Passing probability shown | ||
| Public evidence / methodology material |
- Use without a paid subscription
- Accepts multiple practice results
- NBME form inputs
- Free 120 input
- UWSA input named on public product page
- CMS subject-score guidance
- Planning range shown
- Passing probability shown
- Public evidence / methodology material
- Use without a paid subscription
- Accepts multiple practice results
- NBME form inputs
- Free 120 input
- UWSA input named on public product page
- CMS subject-score guidance
- Planning range shown
- Passing probability shown
- Public evidence / methodology material
When the AMBOSS workflow may fit
AMBOSS states that its Score Predictor accepts practice-exam results, updates as results are added, displays a score range and passing probability, and connects the output with its study tools. It also states that submitting results for a prediction requires an active subscription. Verify current access and inclusions on the official page before choosing it.
When the NBMEcalc workflow may fit
- You want to calculate without an account or subscription
- You want to enter the source types explicitly supported here
- You want the internal adjustments and limitations published alongside the tool
- You accept that NBMEcalc has not published a holdout validation report
Bottom line
Choose based on input compatibility, access, evidence disclosure, and the decision you need to make—not a winner label. Neither product should replace official assessment feedback or an institution's test-date process.
Try the source-agnostic alternative
Works with UWorld, NBME, UWSA, and Free 120 results — run the Step 2 CK predictor or the Step 1 predictor.