NBMEcalc
Head-to-head review

NBMEcalc vs AMBOSS Step 2 CK Predictor

AMBOSS's predictor is a free hook to drive subscription upgrades — it only works inside their ecosystem. NBMEcalc is source-agnostic. Here is the comparison.

Feature-by-feature

NBMEcalc
  • Works without AMBOSS subscription
  • Exam-specific NBME forms
  • UWSA 1 & 2 input
  • Free 120 input
  • CMS Form subject input
  • Multi-input weighted aggregation
  • 95% confidence interval
  • Personalized study plan
  • Free unlimited use
  • Mobile / PWA
  • Detailed methodology document
AMBOSS Predictor
  • Works without AMBOSS subscription
  • Exam-specific NBME forms
  • UWSA 1 & 2 input
  • Free 120 input
  • CMS Form subject input
  • Multi-input weighted aggregation
  • 95% confidence interval
  • Personalized study plan
  • Free unlimited use
  • Mobile / PWA
  • Detailed methodology document

When AMBOSS Predictor makes sense

If you are already a heavy AMBOSS user — questions, library, and SA — their built-in predictor is convenient and well-integrated. You get a quick estimate inside the same tab.

When NBMEcalc wins

  • You used UWorld + NBMEs (no AMBOSS subscription required)
  • You want to combine multiple sources for a tighter prediction
  • You want a 95% confidence interval (AMBOSS gives a point estimate only)
  • You want a personalized study plan based on your weak rotations
  • You don't want to be locked into a specific Q-bank brand

Bottom line

AMBOSS Predictor is a feature, not a tool. NBMEcalc is a dedicated, source-agnostic predictor. If you use multiple Q-banks (most students do), NBMEcalc combines them into a single multi-source estimate.

Try the source-agnostic alternative

Works with UWorld, NBME, UWSA, Free 120, and CMS forms — run the Step 2 CK predictor or the Step 1 predictor.